Discussion:
could not fork new process for connection: Cannot allocate memory
(too old to reply)
Gaetano Mendola
2004-07-25 23:07:31 UTC
Permalink
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Pavel Veretennikov wrote:

| What could be a problem? About 3G of shared memory is allocated to PG,
| 850000 shared_buffers.


I don't know what you problem can be but are you sure you need that
*very huge* ammount of shared memory ? Let us know your tipical
usage of your system.

I seen many Postgres installation with bunch of SHM wasted !!!



Regards
Gaetano Mendola






-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBBD0x7UpzwH2SGd4RAiGqAKDai6Pyu/rsN3zMhMtAj964U9PfMgCeIYX3
3YFXWB++pl55PMZmMQIHZEU=
=CA0p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Tom Lane
2004-07-26 05:24:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gaetano Mendola
| What could be a problem? About 3G of shared memory is allocated to PG,
| 850000 shared_buffers.
I don't know what you problem can be but are you sure you need that
*very huge* ammount of shared memory ?
Conventional wisdom is that setting shared_buffers higher than a few
tens of thousands is a bad idea, no matter how much RAM you have.
See the pgsql-performance archives.

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to ***@postgresql.org)
Loading...